| |
| I fell asleep on the couch last night fairly early in the evening.
*winces*
So for those of you waiting for the last part to Last Train Leaving Wonderland, I apologize.
I'll post it tonight.
Sorry for the delay. - Mood:contrite
| |
|
| Title: Last Train Leaving Wonderland
Author: Lizbeth Marcs
Summary: Xander’s got a plan, but life keeps interfering.
Genre: Future fic, dark fic
Rating: NC-17
Pairing: Xander/Faith
No, your eyes don't deceive. It grew from 3 to 4 parts. Due to LJ posting limits, I couldn't fit the very final section of this story. Still, you won't mind waiting until tomorrow to read the very, very end, right? (*puppy eyes*)
 ( Reeling and Writhing, of course, to begin with, and then the different branches of arithmetic -- Ambition, Distraction, Uglification, and Derision. ) | |
|
| Anyone want to take a wild stab at who said this?
We ourselves are the same Americans who just ten years ago put a man on the Moon. We are the generation that dedicated our society to the pursuit of human rights and equality. And we are the generation that will win the war on the energy problem and in that process rebuild the unity and confidence of America.
We are at a turning point in our history. There are two paths to choose. One is a path I've warned about tonight, the path that leads to fragmentation and self-interest. Down that road lies a mistaken idea of freedom, the right to grasp for ourselves some advantage over others. That path would be one of constant conflict between narrow interests ending in chaos and immobility. It is a certain route to failure.
All the traditions of our past, all the lessons of our heritage, all the promises of our future point to another path, the path of common purpose and the restoration of American values. That path leads to true freedom for our nation and ourselves. We can take the first steps down that path as we begin to solve our energy problem.
Energy will be the immediate test of our ability to unite this nation, and it can also be the standard around which we rally. On the battlefield of energy we can win for our nation a new confidence, and we can seize control again of our common destiny.
Read the whole thing here...
What's truly sad is that he was right then. What's even sadder is that he's more right now. I'm thinking we owe this guy a reeeaaaaalllyyyy big apology. If we as a nation had sucked it up, acted like adults, and followed this path, we probably wouldn't be huffing gas fumes right now. But, nooooooo. You had to vote for mindless optimism that was all about making you feel good. And no, I will never forgive the previous generation for voting in this direction. (Yes, my parents voted for him. At least they didn't vote to re-elect him, but still...) Anyone else feel like sending an electronic card to our parents and grandparents saying, "Thanks for screwing our generation over. No love. Your kids." ? Of course, I only shudder to think what the next few generations will want to send us as a thank you card for this incompetent lying sack of shit. Yeah. I'm in a mood. Because I just read that speech referenced above, and I'm wondering how on earth anyone could've called it the "malaise speech." That speech showed more confidence in the American public and its can-do attitude than I've heard this side of an Barack Obama campaign speech. And my God, isn't that a truly scary thought? - Mood:depressed
| |
|
| Title: Last Train Leaving Wonderland
Author: Lizbeth Marcs
Summary: Xander’s got a plan, but life keeps interfering.
Genre: Future fic, dark fic
Rating: NC-17 Series: Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Characters: Xander, Faith, Giles, Buffy, original characters
Pairings: Xander/Faith Warnings: Multiple deaths (no canon characters), violence, smut, discussion of child rape and drug use, adult language and themes, vague spoilers for all of Buffy the Vampire Slayer and one for Angel the Series (Xander going to Africa post-‘Chosen’)
Author’s Notes: Written for the annual ![[info]](http://p-stat.livejournal.com/img/community.gif) lynnevitational. Takes place in November 2008 (in short, post-‘Chosen’). All related comics are willfully and cheerfully ignored. Disclaimer: Xander Harris, Faith Lehane, Rupert Giles, Buffy Summers and all associated characters and organizations are the property of FOX and Mutant Enemy. Any mention of real life events and real people is not meant to imply that the people or incidents in question as they are used in the story have any relationship to reality. All original characters and the plot are mine. No payment was asked for or received in the writing of this story and no profit was earned. No copyright infringement on FOX or Mutant Enemy is intended.
( Never imagine yourself not to be otherwise than what it might appear to others that what you were or might have been was not otherwise than what you had been would have appeared to them to be otherwise. )
Part 2 will be posted Monday, and Part 3 on Tuesday. YAY for getting this done on deadline. | |
|
| Confession #1:I'm approximately 1 gazillion times more excited about Mama Mia! opening today than I am about The Dark Knight, despite the fact that I can see The Dark Knight at no less than 2 IMAX theaters within easy driving distance. Confession #2:It appears that I will buy anything David Simon does because, as it turns out, he's my favorite author (for television) ever. I own the book Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets, all 7 seasons plus television movie of Homicide: Life on the Street, the book The Corner: A Year in the Life of an Inner-City Neighborhood, the HBO series The Corner, and the first 4 seasons of The Wire (with Season 5 on order for immediate shipping when it's available next month). I am counting down to when Generation Kill will be available on DVD (I don't get HBO) so I can get my hands on it. In short, you know how people will buy anything Joss Whedon does (even when it's total crap) and call him a genius for it (even though it's a case of the emperor walking around completely starkers)? This is apparently how I treat productions involving David Simon, Ed Burns, and partners. How can I put this...long before I let any of David Simon's stuff out of my hands, I will sell both my Angel and Buffy box sets. The hell with that. I will burn my Angel and Buffy box sets before I give up any of David Simon's stuff. (Seriously, those of you who kept looking for meaning in the "numbered shirts" of Buffy Season 6 that actually didn't have any meaning beyond, "We found a bunch of these for cheap in thrift shops?" Try The Wire, which actually has twice the meaning and twice the mythic elements of any Angel and Buffy episode without requiring you to fanwank. Best of all? The Wire actually has continuity that puts most book series to shame. No. I'm not kidding.) - Mood:devious
| |
|
| Sorry for the disappearing act yesterday. I am having a meeting-licious week, which apparently includes surprise meetings that spring up 15 minutes before I'm due to run into them. No, I'm not in trouble. Just hopping busy. Anyway, FYI, over the past 24 hours I've ended up banning what appears to be 8 12 18 20 "spam journals" that have left nonsense replies to some old posts from roughly a year ago. Side note: Suddenly, I'm really, really, really glad that I've banned anonymous commenting. I shudder to think just how bad this could be if it was still allowed. Anyway, I'm dealing with the spam journals as they pop up. While I'm very sure I haven't banned any real people, if you are a real person and have found yourself banned from commenting, ping me and I'll unban you. I might look at your user name funny considering the weirdness of some of the spamming, but I will unban you. ETA: It should be noted that the comments the spam journals leave behind are odd, but not necessarily anything that stands out as particularly inappropriate. It isn't until you check the journals themselves that the wrongness comes into play. All of the spam journals have no "friends," and consist of a single post that, on the surface, seems to be talking about health care or the economy. However, if you try to read that post you realize that it's complete gibebrish. Also, this single post seems to have the same set of tags at the end of the single post. Almost all tags are sexually explicit in nature, with a particular focus on either gay sex or underage sex. Just FYI... ETA2: By request, I'm providing 17 out of 20 of the banned journals. Amazingly enough, 3 of the journals I've banned and reported as spam journals have already been suspended, so there's no point in presenting them here. Here be my blacklist so you can preemptively ban the little darlings for yourselves: barneyy08 (this one doesn't have any entries at all) jorel08 (this one doesn't have any entries at all) kellyqubymjuliaqygakkristenywidakatyrytodcandycugizvictoriabekijjuditiqalecolleeneguhaheidelykiwosarakumitadriannahuqaxcolleenitagecelestiatevuh![[info]](http://p-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif) paulaqiguzzsuzannapivyxETA3:I've been reliably informed by kokuten that the the words that look like LJ tags at the bottom of the single post are actually off-site links. - Mood:working
| |
|
| Isn't this nice? The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services have decided to "re-define" contraception (i.e., hormonal contraception aka, The Pill) as "abortion." Feel free to read the draft regulation here, and if you're female, prepare to seethe. Because, yes, a woman who needs a medication (one that almost every single woman in the U.S. has taken for one reason or another in their lifetime) should be made to run a gauntlet of health care providers who refuse to — y'know — provide health care by making hormonal birth control less accessible. And can all you gals out there tell me why this is so? Here's a hint: Because clearly if you've got an icky vagina you'll only just abuse the privilege of having access to birth control. YOU CAN'T BE TRUSTED YOU DAUGHTER OF EVE YOU! And if you're poor? You're double-plus screwed (<----- see what I did there?), because your health care options are pretty limited. People with health insurance and money can always tell nutjobs like this to go screw themselves and go find a doctor who will write that script, but if you're poor or if you're in a medically underserved area? You may find yourself living "Every Sperm Is Sacred" for reals. So, what's with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services actually redefining the meaning of the term "abortion?" Well, it's to protect aaaaaalllllll those people who should've flunked medical school and should be bared from treating a patient...ever...because they never passed their clinical pharmacology classes. That's right. If your hospital, medical clinical, physician's office, doc-in-the-box, or any other point of contact between patient and doctor accepts any money from the U.S. Government, said medical organization will not be able to fire these ignorant fools just because they refuse to write scripts for or fulfill scripts for medications that are indicated for contraceptive purposes. You think I'm kidding about how these people should've flunked out of medical school? Take a look at how hormonal contraception actually works. (To get you started, look up the brand name or the generic name of any contraceptive drug here at the drugs@FDA Web site). Anyone who actually knows anything about the mechanism of action for hormonal birth control will tell you that it is in no way an abortion. It's not even in the same universe as an abortion, let alone the same ball park. So, what kinds of hormonal birth control might be affected? The pill, the patch, subdermal capsules, hormonally-treated barrier methods. In short, a whole rainbow of contraceptive options could be affected by this. By the by, if you need The Pill to treat your endometriosis, difficult menstrual periods, acne, post-hysterectomy hormonal imbalance, osteoporosis, or any of the other indicated and off-label uses of hormonal agents...you're just as fucked as the women who use it for actual birth control. That's right ladies, we're all sluts now. Here's what drives me wild about this: If you don't want to take hormonal birth control because, for religious reasons, you think it's abortion, then don't take it. You're scientifically and medically wrong for believing it, but if you're being honest about basing your decision on your personal moral code, my hat's off to you. But when you start pushing your damn morality (and, I might add, your medically and scientifically wrong ideas) on people who do not share your belief system, you deserve my foot hitting your crotch at a very high rate of speed. You also deserve to have your medical certification and licenses yanked. You deserve to be fired. If you've got a moral problem with providing health care to patients within their framework, then you shouldn't be in the medical field at all. Period. For more information on this abandonment of sanity, here's the article from the New York Times. Tristero at Hullabaloo has some commentary on this. Here's commentary from RH Reality Check, which tracks reproductive health issues. twistedchick has some important background on the roots of this DHHS proposal as well as ways you can register your opposition with the DHHS and your local Senator. And once more with feeling, The DHHS proposal. Now, if you'll excuse me, it appears I've got a revolution to start planning for. Send lawyers, guns, and money. - Mood:infuriated
| |
|
| Heeee! I'm sure that got someone's attention. So, I'm writing this story for a fic-a-thon that's due next week, right? And it's turning out a whole lot darker than I initially envisioned, right? And in the middle of the story... Ummmm, it won't come out of nowhere for reader, but I think you should all know that it took the writer by surprise. Did I mention that there's this discussion of past drug use and child molestation? No? Let's pretend that I didn't mention it. Don't ask me how, but I think I've managed to write a twisted Faith/Xander story that's shorter than 75 pages... That will clearly need a beta sometime this week because (and I swear I am not making this up):
- I don't write ships
- I don't write smut
- I don't write...ummmm...okay, sometimes I write dark but this is on a whole different level
I have mentioned I'm not a smut writer, a shipper writer, or a darkfic writer, right?- Mood:perplexed
| |
|
| Within the next week, the Massachusetts State Legislature is going to vote on repealing a 1913 law that forbids non-residents from *ahem* enjoying the fruits of marriage if their home state wouldn't recognize the license as legit. Translation: Upon repeal of the law, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts will give you a marriage license, even if your home state won't give you one because it's a no-no for you to get marriage to the partner of your choice under the home state rules. Should the 1913 law be lifted, it wouldn't just benefit gays and lesbians, but also to straight couples who'd be in the SoL boat if they stayed home. Keep in mind, this 1913 law was originally passed under the bad ol' days of miscengenation laws that forbid marriage between blacks and whites. I.e., if you were a Massachusetts resident, or the resident of a state where marriages between blacks and whites were allowed, you could get a marriage license from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts with no fuss. If you were living in a state where marriages between blacks and whites couldn't take place, well, up until 1967 when the Supreme Court ruled on Loving v. Virginia, you couldn't get a Massachusetts wedding license. In any case, after the state began allowing same-sex marriages in 2004, some state legislators, our then-Gov. Mitt Romney (aka, the Lying Sack of Shit hated by Democrats and Republicans alike in this state), and certain "pro-family" groups insisted that the 1913 law be enforced. Keep in mind, not only was the 1913 law rarely enforced up until 2004, but the reason it even existed in the first place was completely due to racism. Yeah, really proud roots the 1913 law has. Hopefully the Legislature will wipe the law from the books. This time, all that's needed is a simple majority to wipe out the 1913 law, rather than a two-thirds vote, which was needed to kill the Constitutional amendment that would've put a 'marriage is only between a man and a woman' amendment on this year's state ballot and put equal rights up to a popular vote. The usual suspects are up in arms and vowing to fight the repeal, of course, never mind the fact that they are slowly but surely being pushed into the dustbin of history (good riddance). Though, you gotta love how the debate is going. It's such a refreshing change from last year's acid-spewing debate over the proposed amendment to the state constitution:
Pro keeping the 1913 law: It's part of the homosexual agenda to make other states recognize same-sex marriage!
Anti keeping the 1913 law: Other states are not our problem.
Pro keeping the 1913 law: We don't want the state to become Las Vegas for homos!
Anti keeping the 1913 law: Tourist dollars from honeymooners! We're gonna make tens millions! Hundreds of millions, even! YAY!
Pro keeping the 1913 law: You're trying to turn us into California!
Anti keeping the 1913 law: They allow same-sex marriage with no restrictions. We gotta play catch-up to stay competitive for those tourist honeymoon dollars. Hey, we're thinking of an ad campaign: "Massachusetts is for Lovers." We're just not sure if we should make Northampton or Provincetown the honeymoon capital. What do you think?
Pro keeping the 1913 law: *calls movers and makes plans to get the hell out of dodge*
Once again, I feel I need to stress this point: the restrictions imposed by the 1913 law affected straight people as well as gays and lesbians. In fact, I think it's pretty safe to say that more straight people have been affected by this law than gays and lesbians. Just so we're clear, before someone drive-by comments to whine that some how those darn homos are getting "special rights" that straight people don't have. Also, the tone of the debate over same-sex marriage is very different this time around. I'm not saying that same-sex marriage supporters are complacent, but there does seem to be a sense that we've got more than enough votes to remove all restrictions on marriage. The political environment is different, and the majority of the legislature is pro-same-sex marriage and equal rights for gays and lesbians. It's even funny how the Boston Globe covers it: like an after-thought. Sort of, "Oh, yeah, one more housekeeping item and then we're done here." You know, sometimes when I sink into a pit of despair, a little thing like this comes along and cheers me up. - Mood:contemplative
| |
|
| Between the heat and the piss-poor air quality, it's no wonder I'm in a horrid mood.
This is where the Y membership comes in handy. Not only is it air conditioned, I can hit things until I feel better.
Also, I would like the approximately 3 billion people at work clamoring for my attention to please leave me alone so I can, y'know, get something accomplished before next year.
Kthanxbi...
Now listening to my Last.FM Personalized Radio Station...
- Mood:grumpy
| |
|
| Hmmmmm, interesting indeed. I've always said: Never put online anything you wouldn't want shouted from the rooftops. Don't post it publicly, don't post it behind a FLock, don't even post it privately. Because I can guarantee that anything, anywhere, that gets posted online, no matter how many privacy settings you put on it, is going to come out whether you like it or not. Luckily for me I almost always follow that bit of advice. Now, as it so happens, less than 1% of my posts are Flocked and looking back at my own archives I haven't FLocked or Privatized anything in months. On the rare (very, very rare) occasions that I do FLock something, it's usually for the following reasons:
- I've got something slightly wanky to say. I know it's wanky and that I might even possibly be in the wrong to get wanky about it. As a result, I FLock it because I don't want to be slammed with even more wank that points out that I'm being just a little bit of a shithead.
- I'm being slightly bitchy about real life stuff (this is less than .0001% of all posts, by the way) and need to vent in a safe space before my head explodes.
- I need to temporarily "store" something online that will eventually be a public post, but I have to do some formatting, linking, or additional research before I make it public. These Flocked/Privatized posts end up getting deleted when the public post is made.
So, imagine my surprise when I find out today that some very old semi-wanky fandom posts got "leaked." And by old posts, I'm talking more than a year old. This (apparently) has happened with more than one post in the fandom category. At this point in time, I don't much care that the targets have found out the general gist of or the word-for-word contents of those posts. If shit gets kicked up in public because of it, there's going to be a whiff of "old news" about it so I'm not too fussed. What gets me, however, is that someone on my FList (and probably not even someone who commented on those posts) decided to forward the contents of these posts (and possibly even comments made to these posts) to the parties in question. Unfortunately, with a FList the size of mine, even when it's filted down to custom FLocks (as the posts in question invariably are), it's almost impossible to figure out who leaked them, what the motivation was, and who they actually leaked it to. That said, please be aware of this when commenting on my (very, very) rare FLocked posts. I clearly have a mole somewhere (and doesn't that sound ominous). As for the leaker, I find out who you are you're getting banned with no warning. Period and amen. Again, I don't actually care at this point in time that the contents of some fandom posts have gone semi-public. What I care about is the fact you didn't respect the FLock or the reasons why those posts were FLocked. This very, very unlocked post brought to you by someone who honestly doesn't have the patience or the time for this shit.- Mood:Why are people idiots?
| |
|
| The 10 Most Awesomely Bad Moments in the Bush Presidency, with informative links for your education. Also, do we really want to emulate the Chinese when torturing questioning prisoners at Guantánamo Bay? I don't think so either, but we're not the ones in charge. The ones in charge are actually all for it. They've written a ton of memos about it, too. Haven't seen that reported too widely, have you? Just one question: Can we send these war criminals to the Hague now? What can I say, there are no 'good Germans' in this country, that's for sure. To really add to that feeling of a downward spiral, Obama doesn't get why a lot of people think the 'Office of Faith-Based Initiatives' is a very, very bad idea. And he's completely tone-deaf about why people wanted him to take a stand against FISA. I knew Obama wasn't going to be bringing us unicorns and rainbows, but this shit this soon? I thought he was a little smarter than that. And you wanna know what really sucks? Obama is better than the alternative. Sometimes I wonder where my country went so, so wrong. Is it bad form to hang black bunting out my window on the the Fourth of July? Because that's just about the only thing that correctly matches my feelings about the U.S. right now. | |
|
| Hey! For once this is on time! My Top 10 tracks according to my LastFM page.
To download any of the above tracks, visit the SaveFile Project Page.The management requests that if you download something that you comment. Gracias- Mood:rushed
| |
|
| (Reposted due to code borking...) Maaaaaaaan, I love the Internet. Without it, I wouldn't be able to find out about stuff like this: Jackie Chan can sing. In fact, he was the Cantonese and Mandarin speaking voice for General Li (which was voiced by Donny Osmond in the English version) in Mulan. Of course, I'm all, "Wait, Jackie Chan can sing?" Don't believe me? Here's Jackie Chan's dub of "I'll Make a Man Out of You" from Mulan (I think it's in Cantonese. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong). (If you want to see the non-cartoon video version of Jackie Chan singing the song, go here and watch him do pretty-pretty martial arts with a staff while singing.) For comparison purposes, here's Donny Osmond's version of "I'll Make a Man out of You." AAAAAaand right now I feel like an idiot because it seems to me that I should have known that Jackie Chan could sing. As a side note, does anyone out there have a recording of Jackie Chan singing "I'll Make a Man out of You?" Because right now, I need to get my hands on this song the way some people need oxygen.
---------------- Now playing: Aretha Franklin - Come Back Babyvia FoxyTunes - Mood:gobsmacked
| |
|
| The latest (belated as always) Monday Top 10 for your pleasure (at least according to My LastFM Page
To download tracks, go to the SaveFile Project Page.
Note: The management kindly requests that you comment if you snipe yourself a few MP3. Gracias muchly.
- Mood:busy
| |
|
| Today has been a day to spot a zillion hilarious vids on my FList. (Seriously, I love you guys...) Frankly, I need the cheer-up, because my lynnvitational fic is turning out hella depressing. Giles won't do what I tell him to, damn it! ( nwhepcat, expect an email in a few days...) But these videos? These videos cheered me right up. The first comes from jblaque. It actually made me giggle like a loon. ( What if 'Stairway to Heaven' was a Beatles song? No. Really. )Remember Where in the hell is Matt?, the original video showing one guy dancing in front of a video camera at various places around the world? There's a sequel, and it's awesome. Found via chase820 and nikitangel. ( It's the little things that keep my faith in humanity alive. )And what must be the flat-out weirdest finds that came from some random link on the Intrawebs (I don't remember where it came from. Sorry), is "One Toke Over the Line" from those crazy, long-haired, alterna-palooza, hippies from the Lawrence Welk Show. ( Prepare to have your brain broken by White People from Middle America. )Glad I could be of service! - Mood:Why do I do this to myself?
| |
|
| This is why Internet Memes sometimes Sucketh the Big Weenie: For the past week or so, I've been seeing a meme going around that quotes this statement: [W]omen are low-hanging fruit, though, in the terms of politics. You can reach up and say, 'I'm pro-choice, he's not.'Then there follows a few more statements about how "I (LJ-owner-type-person) am not low-hanging fruit and I am insulted to be called thus. Therefore, I am going to prove that I am not low-hanging fruit to the ebil Democratic Party/Barak Obama/Both by (choose one of the following): voting for a third-party candidate/voting for McCain/staying home on election day and not voting at all." The reason why it's not word for word is because there's some variation on the wording. However, the following elements are all in place:
- The statement that "women are low-hanging fruit" for the Democratic Party, so none of the candidates have to work too hard to win over women
- The assumption that either Barack Obama , someone high up in his campaign, or some highly placed Democratic Party official said this statement
- To show that women are not low-hanging fruit, they're going to "punish" Obama and/or the Democratic Party come election time by voting Republican or not voting at all
There's just one eensy-meensy-teensy-tiny problem with the above meme: The low-hanging fruit crack was actually said by Chris Matthews. And the person who said "I agree" to that statement was NBC's political director. (Link to Media Matters.) In short, no one involved with the Democratic Party or Barack Obama's presidential campaign said the offending statements. So, would someone care to explain to me why anyone is holding Barack Obama and/or the Democratic Party responsible for something a television news "personality" and a NBC network employee said? Especially Tweety Matthews, who during Hillary Clinton's run really went all out to put the "pig" in "male chauvinist pig." Look, you wanna hold Matthews and MSNBC responsible for that stupid statement? I'm all for it. Sign me up. In fact, let's get the party started over it. But please stop holding Barack Obama and his campaign for every piece of stupid and/or sexist shit that hits the airwaves, especially when the person saying it is: 1) Not associated with his campaign and; 2) Isn't even acting as a spokesman for the Democratic Party. If Obama and his people say/do something stupid, by all means, hold 'em responsible, but at least hold 'em responsible for something they actually said, as opposed to something someone else said. Just sayin'. And on that irritated note, I urge you to read this article from award-winning journalist David Neiwert: How right-wing crap polluted Democrats' political waters, which outlines the rightwingnut noise machine may have helped make the Democratic primary race look far more bruising than it actually was in the press, which has, in turn, created a "perception of reality" among the hard-core supporters of both Hillary and Obama. So, in final note, kiddoes: Please do the world a favor and approach any and all bits of news and Internet memes with a healthy dose of skepticism during this political season. Gracias muchly. ---------------- Now playing: Amy Winehouse - Rehab via FoxyTunes - Mood:irritated
| |
|
| The latest Monday Top 10 with downloads for your pleasure! (I would have done it yesterday, but I left my 320 GB pocket drive at home).
To download tracks, go to the SaveFile Project Page.
Note: The management kindly requests that you comment if you snipe yourself a few MP3. Because nothing is more annoying than seeing stats showing 43 downloads and getting only 5 comments. Gracias muchly.---------------- Now playing: Amr Diab - Awedonyvia FoxyTunes - Mood:ditzy
| |
|
| God, I love the Marvel vs. DC parodies of the Mac vs. Apple commercials from ItsJustSomeRandomGuy. This one is Batman vs. Iron Man. It made me laugh until water shot out of my nose. May cause extreme embarrassment if you watch while at work because you'll be snorting like a waterbuffalo. Loudly. Video courtesy of this thread at the StraightDope message board: Bigger Ass: Tony Stark or Bruce Wayne.
- Mood:giggly
| |
|
|
