liz_marcs (liz_marcs) wrote,
liz_marcs
liz_marcs

  • Mood:

More People Need to Post to LiterarySnark...

Nobody hates a bad book like someone who loves books.

I've been *ahem* pretty lucky in my reading these days, and haven't read anything that pissed me off with its badness recently. As a result, I've forgotten othercat's fabulous community literarysnark.

Then grey_bard posts this fantastic rant about Anne Bishop. Namely how it's all fluffy bunnies and PG-13 in DEMONHOOKERVILLE!

I laughed hysterically. For reals.

Then I became very sad.

We need literarysnark to be more active. There aren't a whole lotta posts there ranting about bad books.

Although one of these days, I'm gonna pull the metaphorical knife on Jacob I Have Loved. Maybe even Wuthering Heights. Yeah.

It's just like othercat sez: "Because 'Classic' Doesn't Mean 'Good.'"

Really, go to literarysnark and start ranting about those bad books. I like being entertained by irate book-lovers.



Now Playing:
Tags: books: pimp, books: snark
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 17 comments