liz_marcs (liz_marcs) wrote,
liz_marcs
liz_marcs

  • Mood:

More People Need to Post to LiterarySnark...

Nobody hates a bad book like someone who loves books.

I've been *ahem* pretty lucky in my reading these days, and haven't read anything that pissed me off with its badness recently. As a result, I've forgotten othercat's fabulous community literarysnark.

Then grey_bard posts this fantastic rant about Anne Bishop. Namely how it's all fluffy bunnies and PG-13 in DEMONHOOKERVILLE!

I laughed hysterically. For reals.

Then I became very sad.

We need literarysnark to be more active. There aren't a whole lotta posts there ranting about bad books.

Although one of these days, I'm gonna pull the metaphorical knife on Jacob I Have Loved. Maybe even Wuthering Heights. Yeah.

It's just like othercat sez: "Because 'Classic' Doesn't Mean 'Good.'"

Really, go to literarysnark and start ranting about those bad books. I like being entertained by irate book-lovers.



Now Playing:
Tags: books: pimp, books: snark
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 17 comments
Previous
← Ctrl ← Alt
Next
Ctrl → Alt →
Previous
← Ctrl ← Alt
Next
Ctrl → Alt →